Countrate high
Version 4 - Last modified 22 Dec 2011
Location
Written procedure on Docushare:
https://www.swift.psu.edu/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-127
Further detail:
http://www.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/swift/docs/procedures/
Purpose
Deal with high RateOp count rates and high DPU count rates.
Although dangerously high count rates are also dealt with by the Safety Circuit
tripping, consistently high count rates can be an indication that something is
wrong with UVOT, Swift or the planning of observations.
Steps for UDS to run
- IDPUCOUNTRATE limit violations are caused by high count rates which should
show up as ISFTYRATEOP limit violations in the "errors" and high count rates in
the graphs (see below), but anyway, look at the time in the email which merely hints at when the problem
happened (it will give a time up to a few hours after: DO NOT MENTION THIS TIME FROM THE SERS EMAIL OR JUST COPY THE EMAIL TO
ANYONE AS IT WILL ONLY CONFUSE).
- Check the angle graphs on http://twins.swift.psu.edu/hk.html or
http://msslje.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/hk.html to find out when the countrate
really was high. Obviously, you'll have to wait until after the MAL
pass and after the ITOS playback before you'll see the angles graph.
You should check approx. the 4 angles graphs immediately before the time on the
email. If you can't access this web site, log onto a machine at Penn State or
MSSL and download the images from there.
- You should be checking the page http://twins.swift.psu.edu/hk.html or
http://msslje.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/hk.html approximately every day anyway to look for
"errors" displayed in the right hand column. A "high violation ISFTYRATEOP" is
the definitive evidence for a high count rate and there should be one of these
when there is a high violation IDPUCOUNTRATE. Whenever there is a "high
violation ISFTYRATEOP", the high countrate should be visible in the
corresponding angles and counts graphs on the same line of the table.
- Checking the corresponding *_icuevents.log should indicate what the
uvotmode was, what the filter was and what the ICU was doing at that time.
- The rateop on the *_counts.png graph is an accurate
measurement of countrate, the dpucountrate is less accurate and the limit
violation itself only tells you it is way above the number given.
- Remember, the time of the IDPUCOUNTRATE limit vioation in the SERS event email is simply
wrong and will never be fixed: DO NOT MENTION THIS TIME FROM THE SERS EMAIL OR JUST COPY THE EMAIL TO
ANYONE AS IT WILL ONLY CONFUSE (see SERS
anomaly G-0165 or SOARS S-Swift-0342).
- Grism observations (also white, B, and sometimes others) are often bright and
still useful so if it is a grism observation that is only just over the limit
and obviously caused by a bright field (the countrate graph is flat) or
obviously caused by the Earth (high countrate when the Earth angle is low) then
there probably isn't a problem worth telling everyone about: in which case just email pjs1.
- If it looks interesting, send to people like Caryl, Sally, Dan, Pete and uvot_cal.
Report as many of the following as possible:
- The countrate
- The time of the high countrate (NOT THE EMAIL TIME).
- The uvotmode: this will be in the *_icuevents.log (and the MasterPPST if it wasn't an AT).
- The filter: this will be in the *_icuevents.log (and this is implicit in the uvotmode).
- If you, the UDS, don't understand or are not 100% sure, email
pjs1 with the details you find for checking first.
- This is not an emergency so there's no need to telephone anybody, just email.
Example email
At 2006-10-01T14:46:00 (day of year 10) the "angle" graphs on
twins.swift.psu.edu show the DPU countrate and RateOp slowly increased up to
and past 200 000 count per second. This was during an observation of the SMC
in the white filter as the Earth approached from 110 to 97 degree.
If you are the planner or this is your observation, please check the uvotmode
used (0x1111) is appropriate and don't be surprised if the image is bright or
there is a black band at the top where data was lost. If the uvotmode is
unsuitable, tell the planner soon.